Purchase INDEXU 3.2E ENHANCED

[esm]

You can purchase the ENHANCED version of INDEXU v3.2.

This version incorporates a significant number of the MODs I have created for INDEXU over the past year and one-half. I have also optimzied some of the code to make it run faster, improved and expanded the static page caching and improved and expanded the mod_rewrite feature and added an alternative Search Engine Friendly method for generating the URL if you can't or don't want to use the mod_rewrite feature.

And the most significant enhancement is the use of an enhanced template parser that is both easy to use and powerful at the same time ( Don't believe me? Compare it to Smarty templates when, and if, INDEXU v4.0 is release ).

If you are not experienced with installation and setup of PHP scripts using MYSQL and/or INDEXU, I suggest you pay someone to do it for you. I will offer installation for $40.00 (this does not include customization of templates, files, etc. )

You must own v3.2 ( or earlier ) of INDEXU or purchase a copy. You can purchase both a licensed copy of INDEXU v3.2 and v3.2E at my site.

You make your purchase here: http://www.indexuhelp.com/amp/signup.php

[brickholius]

Its not clear on your website. Are you charging an additional $99 for the enhanced. Is that on top of the already $99 3.2? If i understand correctly you are charging twice as much for the enhanced version.

Content visible to License Owner only.

[Frank71]

Hello Saint,

some more questions

- I own 3.2, but never installed it - should I install v3.2 before I can buy or install v3.2E ?

- all the code is clear so I won't get problems on my server and can do own changes ?

- how can we buy - do you accept paypal and will I get a small bill ?

- Do you have a online demo to see all is working ?

(Sorry, never tested the beta, because final you was to fast ).

Regards
Frank

[esm]

Content visible to License Owner only.

hhmmm....I thought the pricing was clear. but yes, $99 for just the enhancements (http://www.indexuhelp.com/forum/inde...tree&goto=872&). You must have already purchased v3.2 ( or you also can purchase that at the website ).

Only you can determine if the enhancements are worth the additional cost. Some sites would have no need for the enhancements. Others will see the returns almost immediately. One website owner told me that he recouped his cost of just the mass emailer within a week since he could now communicate with his link owners and could offer advertising specials to specific groups.

I may offer a discount for existing INDEXU users at some point in the feature. But nothing definate yet.

[esm]

Content visible to License Owner only.

Yes, you must install v3.2 first

Content visible to License Owner only.

some of the code for special mods is encoded. All the variables are outside the encryped code and thus modifiable by you.

Content visible to License Owner only.

Yes, INDEXU v3.2E by LinksCoder.com can be purchased by using PayPal.

Content visible to License Owner only.

Since I announced v3.2E, my signature line has always had a link to the demo. Here is that line:

Click Here for a Demo

[Frank71]

Hello,

Ok, but why should I install V3.2 first ??

Encoded is very bad, found the first bug in seconds

->> http://www.indexuhelp.com/indexu32e/index.php

Main Category Links are in small and big letters, sub categories are only small letters (BETTER). Click on a subcategory link - next categories and also path info are again Big and small letters - double content.
You forgot to change and replace all positions in the script (3-4 if I remeber right).

I'm sure there will be more of that - are we able to change that or all is encoded ?

Same for link-titles, sometimes all letters are small (details), sometimes big and small (sitemods).
I wrote this in you forum some weeks ago
Again the example, if the mods are encoded allways I must ask you for a change and that is really bad, because time will come and you are gone.

Do you have any links with special german or spanish letters in the demo to see how them works ?

How can I test that cache is working ?

Link in a frame can be deacitvated, yes ?
Link in a Iframe is also possible ?
Which variables can I give to the frameset to add additional info ?

Reviews also for non members possible ?

How did you solve the rating problem ?

SHOWALPHA still show the wrong detail links - sure that here "title in url" links are possible ?
Encoded ?
NEW and Pick Links section the same problem !!!


Show all pagionation isn't static !
Hot the same...

IN top_rated detail links are only small letters, rest big and small letters

Old new listings section - click on a date will bring the index instead the results - bug !

Ok, thats from a first test of your demo.
Most of them is old and I wrote it also in your forum.

Sorry, you did a great work (really great !!!), but this version isn't a release for normal indexu users without code knowledge !
The different url-format will bring a lot of double content in Google and that is bad

Also encoded code sections are a big risk - what is the price for a normal and clean version where I can fix bugs and do changes as I like ?

Uff, sounds hard - shouldn'd sound hart, you did really a good work !!!


Some more questions:
- php is possible in all templates, also on more thatn one row:
<php>include blabla;
blabla;</php>

- did you a mod to show last searched words also in the templates with mod_rewrite (hack out of admin menu) ??

- search for special letters like áói´will also finde aoi and backwards ?

A lot of questions

Best Regards
Frank

[esm]

Content visible to License Owner only.

because I said to.

Content visible to License Owner only.

I can change it or your can change it.

Content visible to License Owner only.

yes, you can change it if you like.

Content visible to License Owner only.

only three are encoded and only the mysql portion and I doubt that will ever change as they are all standard mysql statements.

Content visible to License Owner only.

Nope, just english.

Content visible to License Owner only.

There is no way to test it.

Content visible to License Owner only.

Yes. All you have to do is change one variable from Yes to No.

Content visible to License Owner only.

I don't know. I have never tried it. Can you use it with v3.1? If so, then you can use it with v3.2/v3.2E.

Content visible to License Owner only.

????? You will need to explain this more.

Content visible to License Owner only.

Yes, just change a variable.

Content visible to License Owner only.

And what problem is that?

Content visible to License Owner only.

How does it show "the wrong detail links?" ????

Content visible to License Owner only.

No. 99% of the MOD code is clear.

Content visible to License Owner only.

see above. I don't understand what you wrote.

Content visible to License Owner only.

Same

Content visible to License Owner only.

The earlier fix above will also fix the categories.

Content visible to License Owner only.

In my testing I spent some time trying to fix that a few weeks ago but concluded it was my site and not a bug that was causing that.

Content visible to License Owner only.

I would disagree with that. The URLs that you seem so paranoid are all controlled by the same function.

Content visible to License Owner only.

then with probably billions of pages like that so a lot of folk are not going to be happy.

It exists everywhere. see:
http://gossamer-threads.com/perl/lin.../page.cgi?t=av

Content visible to License Owner only.

yes, but in different way than you describe.

Content visible to License Owner only.

No. but it can be done.

Content visible to License Owner only.

No.

[Frank71]

Hm

<How can I test that cache is working ?

>There is no way to test it.

- hm, why are you sure it is working ?


<How did you solve the rating problem ?

>And what problem is that?

- multipli ratings from one user, rating spam...


<SHOWALPHA still show the wrong detail links - sure that here "title in url" links are possible ?

>How does it show "the wrong detail links?" ????

- if I remeber it shows /detail-12345.html and the rest shows /..Title_in_url-12345.html and the right way is /....title_in_url-detail.html

-> You sell the script, so it should be your interest to sell a plug and play script.
Newer user never will check that, before Google will find one and the same site with 100% same content and 3 different urls.
If you say that is encoded and in show_alpha "titles in url" is possible it is not may problem, I have to rework nearly all links and text becauseit is english, but other users will think you know what you do and sell...


from my site this is only a testreport and I thought you have more fun to do a perfect work as Dody....


<Link in a frame can be deacitvated, yes ?

<Yes. All you have to do is change one variable from Yes to No.

- Great ! Not sure it is a good idea, but is worth a try.
You know that Iframe not is possible in V3.1 - it was only a question / suggestion.


<Which variables can I give to the frameset to add additional info ?

>????? You will need to explain this more.

- now I have a header with your logo and than the site in a frame.
May be some more info in the top_frame is nice like rating box for direct rating, search box and so on. I think rating and report broken link is useful.
But for this I need the link-ID in this top_frame.


<Reviews also for non members possible ?

>Yes, just change a variable.

- great, may be the same change like in V3... Very important for pages without user management.


<NEW and Pick Links section the same problem !!!
Show all pagionation isn't static !
Hot the same...

>see above. I don't understand what you wrote.

- hmpf, look to your page, you need seconds to see, that here the pagination isn't rewritten with mod_rewrite and if you comare detail links by example with browse you will see, that you use different link-formats for one and the same detail-page !
This is the biggest bug of your great work, because it will KILL (!!!) every site in Google !!


<but this version isn't a release for normal indexu users without code knowledge !

<I would disagree with that. The URLs that you seem so paranoid are all <controlled by the same function.

- than it is buggy, because you have at minimum 3 different formats for the same link style
Come on, (hm, searching the right words ) I meant no harm (can I say that ?), really GREAT work, but this small topic (in V3 at minimum 3 places to change in the code + all templates) is really bad solved.
Give it a chance and you can really sell a lot of this script, because with the right url it is perfect and unic on market !
I lost several domains in G. this year, I know that I say - ALSO you loose completly internal link-popularity !


<php is possible in all templates, also on more thatn one row:
<php>include blabla;
blabla;</php>

>yes, but in different way than you describe.

- how ?


<did you a mod to show last searched words also in the templates with mod_rewrite (hack out of admin menu) ??

>No. but it can be done.

>search for special letters like áói´will also finde aoi and backwards ?

>No.

- these mods are nearly the same, because seached keywords are url-coded in the url or you have to change that and this means to to a second search for special letters. Something very important for international scripts

What is the price ?


Regards
Frank

[esm]

Hm

<How can I test that cache is working ?

>There is no way to test it.

- hm, why are you sure it is working ?
*because I can FTP into the server and look at the pages....

<How did you solve the rating problem ?

>And what problem is that?

- multipli ratings from one user, rating spam...
*I haven't looked recently but I believe there is an IP check. and there is a SQL field for it. I don't have much plans for it.

MY ADVICE: remove the rating as it is bogus anyway.

<SHOWALPHA still show the wrong detail links - sure that here "title in url" links are possible ?

>How does it show "the wrong detail links?" ????

- if I remeber it shows /detail-12345.html and the rest shows /..Title_in_url-12345.html and the right way is /....title_in_url-detail.html

-> You sell the script, so it should be your interest to sell a plug and play script.
Newer user never will check that, before Google will find one and the same site with 100% same content and 3 different urls.
If you say that is encoded and in show_alpha "titles in url" is possible it is not may problem, I have to rework nearly all links and text becauseit is english, but other users will think you know what you do and sell...
don't get your panties in a wad, frank. I'll change it just for you.

*based on the below links which I found thru a search of Google , you might tell dmoz they could do the same
http://www.hotscripts.com/PHP/index.html
http://dmoz.org/Games/
http://dmoz.org/Games/Yard,_Deck,_and_Table_Games/
http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.n...ackets-Drapes/
apparently, they will lose their ranking in Google, too. Too, bad, I liked Goolge. Ooops, wait a minute: http://dmoz.org/Games/ is on the first page when you search for "games." bye, frank.

from my site this is only a testreport and I thought you have more fun to do a perfect work as Dody....
*Frank, there is no such thing as perfect. If you really beleive that, then you should stop using software because none is perfect and they ALL have bugs.


<Link in a frame can be deacitvated, yes ?

<Yes. All you have to do is change one variable from Yes to No.

- Great ! Not sure it is a good idea, but is worth a try.
You know that Iframe not is possible in V3.1 - it was only a question / suggestion.


<Which variables can I give to the frameset to add additional info ?

>????? You will need to explain this more.

- now I have a header with your logo and than the site in a frame.
May be some more info in the top_frame is nice like rating box for direct rating, search box and so on. I think rating and report broken link is useful.
But for this I need the link-ID in this top_frame.
*the frameset is just html. put whatever you like there. Not sure about any indexu stuff, but you could try it. let us know the results.

<Reviews also for non members possible ?

>Yes, just change a variable.

- great, may be the same change like in V3... Very important for pages without user management.
Same answer as rating:
MY ADVICE: remove the review as it is bogus anyway.

<NEW and Pick Links section the same problem !!!
Show all pagionation isn't static !
Hot the same...

>see above. I don't understand what you wrote.

- hmpf, look to your page, you need seconds to see, that here the pagination isn't rewritten with mod_rewrite and if you comare detail links by example with browse you will see, that you use different link-formats for one and the same detail-page !
This is the biggest bug of your great work, because it will KILL (!!!) every site in Google !!

Did you forget to take your medication today, Frank. See
http://dmoz.org/Games/

based on that page, dmoz is dead according to you.

I am not convinced by your arguments. As a matter of fact, based on what I see, you are not correct. And when you think about it, it would seem unreasonable for Google to try to impose that kind of formatting on the entire world.

<but this version isn't a release for normal indexu users without code knowledge !

<I would disagree with that. The URLs that you seem so paranoid are all <controlled by the same function.

- than it is buggy, because you have at minimum 3 different formats for the same link style
Come on, (hm, searching the right words ) I meant no harm (can I say that ?), really GREAT work, but this small topic (in V3 at minimum 3 places to change in the code + all templates) is really bad solved.
Give it a chance and you can really sell a lot of this script, because with the right url it is perfect and unic on market !
I lost several domains in G. this year, I know that I say - ALSO you loose completly internal link-popularity !
- based on what I see, I would strongly agree with you. but I am not going to argue the point.

<php is possible in all templates, also on more thatn one row:
<php>include blabla;
blabla;</php>

>yes, but in different way than you describe.

- how ?
*buy INDEXU V3.2e by LinksCoder and find out...

<did you a mod to show last searched words also in the templates with mod_rewrite (hack out of admin menu) ??

>No. but it can be done.

>search for special letters like áói´will also finde aoi and backwards ?

>No.

- these mods are nearly the same, because seached keywords are url-coded in the url or you have to change that and this means to to a second search for special letters. Something very important for international scripts
*I have no knowledge of this so I cannot help you here.

What is the price ?
*Frank, read this thread. I stated the price in it.

Regards
Frank

[Frank71]

Hello Dody,

I give up, may be my english ist to bad.
I think the basic for a link-category-script is a good link-structure.
There is no sense to use different link-formats for the same link and you can tell what you want and you can give me all these dummy example that you are grabing from internet.
Your site is not dmoz, because Google is using dmoz !

May be it isn't important for other users and we can speak again about this topic, if some one else is wondering about his bad results in search engines...

Regards
Frank

[esm]

I'm not opposed to lower case in the URL. But I don't think that has anything to do with Google ranking. Just look at the links I gave you. they all came off the first page or two of a Google search (well, not the one to Hotscripts).

I doubt that Google is trying to change the world to lowercase...

as for different type URLs on a page just look at the different hyperlinks on the page at:
http://dmoz.org/Games/

For example, I see
http://dmoz.org/World/Kannada/%e0%b2...2%9f%e0%b2%bf/
http://search.lycos.com/?lpv=1&loc=searchhp&query=games
http://dmoz.org/Business/Consumer_Go...oys_and_Games/
http://dmoz.org/Games/Yard,_Deck,_and_Table_Games/ (this one even has commas!)
http://report-abuse.dmoz.org/?cat=Games

Once again, I doubt that Google is trying to change the world to a single type of URL...

But I will try to standardize things.

[Frank71]

FORGET DMOZ !
Never you will get a link popularity like them !
On small searches like a search for a specific product you will see the difference, by the way, think about the sense to use big letters in a url.... May be you can ask some one if you don't know it, but where is the sense ?

FIRST ANF MORE IMPORTANT IS, THAT A WEBSITE IS UNIC, SO ALL LINKS TO THIS SITE MUST BE THE SAME.
MOD REWRITE IS A CREATION BY USER TO GET BETTER LOOKING URL AND BETTER INDEXING IN SEARCHENGINES - WHY USE DIFFERENT URLS FOR ONE SITE ?
I lost at minimum 5 good urls this year in G., you don't know what you say...

If you say this is ok and a great feature of your script, you must think that all your customer are stupid.

Sorry, as I wrote you did a great work, but at the end it seems you are not better as other coders, because these are basics and I can't believe why you won't understand it ?!

Only lower case letters is only a bonus, may be you have another opinion, ok, I did a test and the result is clear

Frank

[morgankd]

Can you purchase some of the hacks serprate or as a group for v3.2E?

[esm]

you can purchase them individually.

see: http://www.indexuhelp.com/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=174&

[Frank71]

esm ??
And me ?
Didn't you get the pms ?
Frank